Validating the Process-Modelling Practice Model
Author:
Abstract
The paper revises an existing model of process-modelling practice and uses it in an explorative survey of Norwegian model-based process-change projects. A central hypothesis is confirmed: there is a positive relationship between modelling processes and project outcome, where modelling process is measured in terms of management support, lack of resistance, in-project training and model types. In particular, management support and in-project training are robust predictors of project outcome. Practical and theoretical implications are presented and discussed. Important paths for further work include improving instrument validity and elaborating the research model by including other organisational and social dimensions of process-modelling behaviour and effects. Cross-national studies are also called for.
- Citation
- BibTeX
Eikebrook, T. R., Iden, J., Olsen, D. H. & Opdahl, A. L.,
(2008).
Validating the Process-Modelling Practice Model.
Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - An International Journal: Vol. 3, Nr. 2.
Berlin:
Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V..
(S. 3-17).
DOI: 10.18417/emisa.3.2.1
@article{mci/Eikebrook2008,
author = {Eikebrook, Tom R. AND Iden, Jon AND Olsen, Dag H. AND Opdahl, Andreas L.},
title = {Validating the Process-Modelling Practice Model},
journal = {Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - An International Journal},
volume = {3},
number = {2},
year = {2008},
,
pages = { 3-17 } ,
doi = { 10.18417/emisa.3.2.1 }
}
author = {Eikebrook, Tom R. AND Iden, Jon AND Olsen, Dag H. AND Opdahl, Andreas L.},
title = {Validating the Process-Modelling Practice Model},
journal = {Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - An International Journal},
volume = {3},
number = {2},
year = {2008},
,
pages = { 3-17 } ,
doi = { 10.18417/emisa.3.2.1 }
}
Dateien | Groesse | Format | Anzeige | |
---|---|---|---|---|
49-90-1-SM.pdf | 1.375Mb | View/ |
Sollte hier kein Volltext (PDF) verlinkt sein, dann kann es sein, dass dieser aus verschiedenen Gruenden (z.B. Lizenzen oder Copyright) nur in einer anderen Digital Library verfuegbar ist. Versuchen Sie in diesem Fall einen Zugriff ueber die verlinkte DOI: 10.18417/emisa.3.2.1
Haben Sie fehlerhafte Angaben entdeckt? Sagen Sie uns Bescheid: Send Feedback
More Info
DOI: 10.18417/emisa.3.2.1
ISSN: 1866-3621
xmlui.MetaDataDisplay.field.date: 2008
Language:
(en)

Content Type: Text/Journal Article